[ad_1]
On this “Face the Nation” broadcast moderated by Margaret Brennan:
- Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democrat of California
- Ukrainian Ambassador to the U.S. Oksana Markarova
- Jim Taiclet, chairman and CEO of Lockheed Martin
- Rep. Nancy Mace, Republican of South Carolina
- Eric Holder, former lawyer normal
Click on right here to browse full transcripts of “Face the Nation.”
MARGARET BRENNAN: I am Margaret Brennan in Washington.
And this week on Face the Nation: The way forward for a lady’s proper to decide on an abortion is in jeopardy in lots of states throughout the nation, as an unprecedented leak of a draft Supreme Courtroom resolution to overturn Roe vs. Wade creates the political equal of an earthquake.
There’s turmoil across the nation, as Republicans and Democrats scramble to determine what the political and the sensible affect of recent abortion restrictions may very well be.
Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi can be with us. Plus, we are going to hear from South Carolina Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace.
Then: Ukraine’s army is on excessive alert this weekend, bracing for extra assaults, as Vladimir Putin plans to rejoice Russia’s annual Victory Day.
Ukraine’s ambassador to america, Oksana Markarova, can be right here with the newest.
Plus, we are going to hear from the CEO of Lockheed Martin, Jim Taiclet, about what his firm is doing to assist present weapons for the conflict effort in Ukraine.
And, lastly, we are going to check out the politics of this 12 months’s spherical of congressional redistricting fights with former Obama Legal professional Common Eric Holder. His new e book is “Our Unfinished March.”
It is all simply forward on Face the Nation.
Good morning, and welcome to Face the Nation.
It has been a turbulent week throughout the nation, as probably the most esteemed establishments in our authorities, the Supreme Courtroom, skilled one thing that occurs on a regular basis right here in Washington, the leak of a doc to the media. However this leak was explosive.
Not solely does it draw into query the sanctity of the courtroom, however, if the draft opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito holds, Roe vs. Wade could also be overturned early this summer time. At the moment, abortion entry is federally protected as much as the purpose of viability.
If overturned, abortion might develop into unlawful or considerably restricted in 23 states. Republicans have been reserved of their response, however Democrats are livid.
And we go now to the highest Democrat in Congress, Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who joins us this Mom’s Day from San Francisco.
Pleased Mom’s Day to you, Madam Speaker.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI (D-California): Thanks. Pleased Mom’s Day to you, Margaret.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Thanks.
And earlier than we get to abortion, we did have this shock go to on Mom’s Day by the primary woman, Dr. Jill Biden, to Ukraine.
Final Sunday, you had been in Kyiv assembly with Ukraine’s president. How rapidly can Congress ship this $33 billion in help that has been promised?
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: I feel we can do it as rapidly as potential.
We’ve nice bipartisanship by way of our assist for the combat for democracy that the individuals of Ukraine are making. We’ve respect for the technique of the president of Ukraine. And now we have a recognition of the necessity for weapons, for sanctions — extra weapons, extra sanctions, extra financial help, and extra humanitarian help.
I used to be very proud to be there with my colleagues to speak about these very particular points and our bipartisan assist for them.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And also you assume you will get that completed earlier than the tip of the month?
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: I feel now we have to.
MARGARET BRENNAN: OK.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: Sure, I feel now we have to.
The specificity with which we focus on these issues with the president, president of Ukraine, the connection that now we have with the ambassador, whom you should have on the present later, we’re very present on the wants and the urgency. And, once more, we may have bipartisanship as we go ahead with it.
MARGARET BRENNAN: OK.
Madam Speaker, I need to speak to you, in fact, about abortion. California’s Governor Gavin Newsom stated Democrats have failed to focus on Republicans on this challenge.
Here is what he needed to say:
(Start VT)
GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM (D-California): The place is the Democratic Social gathering? The place’s the celebration? Why aren’t we calling this out? It is a concerted, coordinated effort. And, sure, they’re successful. We have to rise up. The place’s the counteroffensive?
(Finish VT)
MARGARET BRENNAN: Madam Speaker, why had been pro-abortion rights Democrats outmaneuvered?
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: I’ve — I do not know. The actual fact is that now we have been combating for a girl’s proper to decide on, and that’s to decide on.
We’ve been combating towards the Republicans within the Congress consistently as a result of the actual fact is, they’re anti — not simply anti a lady’s proper to decide on by way of terminating a being pregnant, however by way of entry to contraception and household planning and the remainder, each domestically and globally.
It is a fixed combat that we have had for generations — I imply, many years, I ought to say…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Proper.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: … in my case within the Congress.
And the — we had been bipartisan early on, assist for a girl’s proper to decide on, till the politics have modified. And that is what occurred to the courtroom.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: The science hasn’t modified. The — however the courtroom modified. And, due to this fact, they’re deciding that it will likely be totally different.
I do not know why anyone would make that assertion, except they had been unaware of the combat that has been happening.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Properly, you could have been combating for many years on this challenge.
However again when Democrats held majorities within the Home and the Senate, 2009, while you had been speaker, President Obama was requested about codifying Roe versus Wade and stated abortion is a ethical and moral challenge and — quote — “not the very best legislative precedence.”
Do you assume it was a mistake for him, for different presidents to not push tougher when Democrats had the bulk?
(CROSSTALK)
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: If I simply might, the main focus now we have proper now’s an pressing one in an effort to attempt to enhance — and attempt to enhance this, whether or not we’re calling it faux or draft resolution, no matter it’s. I feel that this can be a waste of time.
The actual fact is, in ’09, we actually didn’t have a pro-choice Democratic Social gathering. I needed to combat towards among the individuals who didn’t need to cross the Reasonably priced Care Act as a result of they had been involved that it would allow extra freedom of selection. It actually did not go down that path.
Proper now, we do have a pro-choice Democratic Congress, and we handed the legislation months in the past, in final, I feel, September.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You probably did within the Home, sure.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: It has been some time. It is a lot of votes.
The — however the reality is also…
MARGARET BRENNAN: However the votes aren’t there within the Senate.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: Properly, the Senate is — you will have to speak to the Senate concerning the Senate.
However I do assume that it places an urgency on what’s occurring within the election. Two extra — one or two extra senators might sweep again the filibuster rule for this function, after which ladies would have a proper to decide on.
That is about one thing so severe and so private and so disrespectful of ladies. Right here we’re on Mom’s Day, every week the place the courtroom has slapped ladies within the face, by way of the disrespect for his or her judgments…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: … concerning the dimension and timing of their households.
So, the actual fact is, let’s preserve our eye on the ball. And the ball is within the courtroom of these justices, certainly one of whom not less than stated time and again that precedent — that priority has been established time and again on Roe v. Wade and that — so, this resolution is about being anti-precedent and anti- privateness, and has severe ramifications as we go — as we go down this path. And it needs to be softened.
I do not assume there is a good consequence, however there’s a greater consequence so far as that is involved.
MARGARET BRENNAN: By way of the…
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: And, once more, let’s simply be prayerful about this. That is — that is about respect for privateness.
What’s subsequent? What’s subsequent? Marriage equality? What’s subsequent, contraception? What’s subsequent?
MARGARET BRENNAN: Do it’s essential to write payments to enshrine these issues? These stuff you simply stated you are involved about, do you want payments to enshrine these now? Contraception entry.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: Excuse me?
MARGARET BRENNAN: The stuff you assume is perhaps subsequent, do it’s essential to legislate to enshrine these in legislation proper now to guard them, in case you assume the courtroom might overturn?
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: What is admittedly attention-grabbing, Margaret, about that is, for many years, I’ve been attempting to say to my Republican mates and ladies who care a couple of lady’s proper to decide on, who contribute to Deliberate Parenthood and all of these organizations, you possibly can’t do this and anticipate — you have to weigh in with your individual celebration on this.
Barbara Bush, early on, Republicans had been very a lot about household planning and respect for ladies. So, the factor is, is that most individuals at all times thought that this debate within the Congress was concerning the termination of a being pregnant, nevertheless it wasn’t.
My Republican colleagues have stated to me every now and then, we’re not for any household planning domestically or globally, as a result of I used to be attempting to get them to assist us on some world household planning points.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Proper.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: We’re not for any of it.
And most of the people do not know that. And we do not need to be — you recognize, this can be a reality. It is a reality. That is what they imagine. And so they’re true to their beliefs.
MARGARET BRENNAN: However given the — given the urgency of with which you are talking, the Reproductive Alternative Act, two pro-abortion rights Republicans within the Senate, Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski, put that ahead. Chief Schumer says it is not even price placing to a vote.
However while you do have Republicans thinking about working collectively, is {that a} strategic mistake? You say that is an emergency.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: Properly, it is dependent upon what the laws is and what the affect that it has on ladies’s lives.
The enshrinement of Roe v. Wade into the legislation is the best way in an effort to defend a lady’s proper to decide on. I do not know why they are saying they’re for that and cannot be for this laws. Ought to all of us have a dialogue and discover our frequent floor? All the time. All the time.
However this — you are both for the enshrinement of Roe v. Wade otherwise you’re not. It is the legislation of the land 50 — or almost 50 years.
MARGARET BRENNAN: 12 months
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: The priority — priority of it has been reaffirmed, what, 14 instances.
And simply because there was…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: The Republicans had been very clear once they had a presidential marketing campaign that their marketing campaign was to elect a president who would appoint judges who would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade. It did not say the science would change.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Proper.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: And yet one more level in that regard.
Mitch McConnell pulled again the filibuster rule in an effort to have these justices confirmed by 51 — by not needing 60 votes, by 51.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Understood.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: So, this can be a political resolution on the a part of this…
MARGARET BRENNAN: OK.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: The rule of legislation in our nation ought to be revered. Girls ought to be revered to make their very own judgments with their household, their physician, their God.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Proper.
Speaker Pelosi, thanks on your time this morning.
Face the Nation can be again in a minute. Stick with us.
(ANNOUNCEMENTS)
MARGARET BRENNAN: The CIA director stated yesterday that Russian President Vladimir Putin is doubling down on his invasion of Ukraine and doesn’t imagine that he can afford to lose. Violence is now escalating within the east.
CBS Information senior overseas correspondent Charlie D’Agata is in Ukraine — Charlie.
CHARLIE D’AGATA: Good morning, Margaret.
The Ukrainian authorities blames Russian forces of bombing a college the place dozens of individuals had been taking shelter in Luhansk. Right here in Kramatorsk, the bombardment has worsened too. That is among the destruction left behind after a rocket assault struck a number of residential neighborhoods.
(Start VT)
CHARLIE D’AGATA (voice-over): Amid the ruins, in every single place proof of peculiar lives violently interrupted, a lady’s shoe, kids’s toys scattered on the bottom, a favourite jacket now hanging from a tree.
A number of miles additional east in Luhansk, emergency crews dig for survivors in a bombed faculty, the place Ukrainian authorities say 90 individuals had been taking shelter. In Mariupol, authorities officers say, whereas all ladies, kids and the aged have lastly escaped from the besieged metal plant, as many as 2,000 Ukrainian forces stay, some medics, some badly wounded, some nonetheless combating to the tip.
We traveled to the battered village of Velyka Novosilka, round 100 miles north of Mariupol, the place 10 Russian battalion teams, round 10,000 troops, have already been redeployed.
U.S. and Ukrainian intelligence says these Russians are actually massing on the outskirts of this city. It is clearly come beneath artillery assault. The explosions are ringing out now.
We discovered Irina Ilyenko and neighbor Valentina Hogenova within the ruins of their properties.
(WOMAN SPEAKING IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE)
CHARLIE D’AGATA: Throughout, shredded metallic, downed bushes, shattered home windows, belongings blown out of bedrooms and onto branches.
Are you able to describe what occurred?
(WOMAN SPEAKING IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE)
CHARLIE D’AGATA: “I used to be simply sitting within the hall when the explosions occurred,” she stated, “overlaying my ears and praying. The explosions deafened me.”
Wow.
(WOMAN SPEAKING IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE)
CHARLIE D’AGATA: “Oh, my God,” she says.
Does that occur quite a bit?
(WOMAN SPEAKING IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE)
CHARLIE D’AGATA: There is not any water or electrical energy. She’s determined to flee, however says she will’t depart her bedridden husband behind.
(WOMAN SPEAKING IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE)
CHARLIE D’AGATA: “I simply need peace to return to this land,” she stated. “I do not need any extra conflict and anger.”
(Finish VT)
CHARLIE D’AGATA: That village is true on the trail of Russia’s essential advance from the south.
Right here, Kramatorsk is on the firing line from the north. The Russian technique is to shut that hole and encompass tens of hundreds of Ukrainian troops — Margaret.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Charlie D’Agata, thanks.
And a few breaking information this morning. CBS Information has realized that the Biden administration is sending a small group of American diplomats, together with the performing ambassador to the U.S. embassy in Kyiv, to counter Russia’s Victory Day celebrations.
State Division sources inform CBS that the embassy hopes to renew operations and lift the American flag there within the coming weeks.
We flip now to Ukraine’s ambassador to america, Oksana Markarova.
Good morning. Welcome again to this system.
OKSANA MARKAROVA (Ukrainian Ambassador to america): Good morning, and pleased Mom’s Day.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Pleased Mom’s Day to you as nicely and to all of the moms on the market.
President Zelenskyy has stated that he’ll converse with President Biden and different world leaders this morning. What are you anticipating by way of additional assist?
AMBASSADOR OKSANA MARKAROVA: Thanks.
Properly, as we rejoice the 77th additionally anniversary of the tip of the World Struggle II, it is vital that all of us do the whole lot potential to cease the conflict that Russian regime, very very like Nazi regime, began in Europe once more.
So the president will increase the whole lot that now we have been discussing throughout the previous — this previous 73 days, extra army assist, extra sanctions, extra monetary assist to Ukraine. We depend on all of our mates and allies to assist us with the whole lot, so we are able to cease Russia whereas it is nonetheless in Ukraine.
MARGARET BRENNAN: President Putin is anticipated to make a speech tomorrow in Purple Sq.. It is not clear precisely what he’s going to announce, however the CIA director stated yesterday Putin is doubling down. What precisely are you making ready for?
AMBASSADOR OKSANA MARKAROVA: Properly, we all know that there are not any purple strains for the regime in Moscow, so we’re making ready for the whole lot.
They stated they won’t go into — that they weren’t going to assault us. And so they did. They stated that there isn’t any conflict in Ukraine for the previous eight years. And we all know it was. They stated they did not take the Crimea. And so they did. They stated they are not killing civilians, and but we see in every single place the deaths of ladies, kids. They torture them. They rape them. They kill them.
So we are able to depend that Putin and imperialistic Russia will do the whole lot dangerous they will probably attempt to do. The query is, are all of us ready, the civilized world, to do the whole lot potential to defend our democracy and freedom?
And Ukraine actually isn’t solely prepared, however reveals for the previous 74 days that we bravely defend these values and defend our properties.
MARGARET BRENNAN: There’s some hypothesis that Putin might formally acknowledge the nation is at conflict after which begin conscripting troopers, which might assist him construct up that offensive within the east.
Is that what you are anticipating?
AMBASSADOR OKSANA MARKAROVA: Properly, that may be the primary time when Putin will say the reality, that it’s conflict and that he’s in dire want of conscripting troopers.
I hope that then it will likely be evident for all — to all Russians what they’re doing in Ukraine, that it is an aggressive conflict. They attacked a neighboring nation, a peaceable nation. And the query is, are they ready to have extra tens of hundreds dying in Ukraine for no purpose in any respect?
MARGARET BRENNAN: The U.S. stated a number of days in the past that Russia is planning sham elections and they are going to attempt to annex elements of your nation, Donetsk, Luhansk within the east, additionally Kherson.
They’re already renaming colleges and streets, educating Russian curriculum, forcing the usage of their foreign money. So, what does dismantling this a part of your nation truly do? As a result of if you wish to get to a peace negotiation, they’re already form of swallowing elements of your nation and attempting to combine it.
AMBASSADOR OKSANA MARKAROVA: Properly, along with all of the conflict crimes they’re doing in Ukraine, that is a part of their M.O. We noticed it in Donetsk and Luhansk, which they occupied in 2014. We noticed it in Crimea.
So that they tried to create the sham elections. They can not discover sufficient Ukrainians to take part in them, as we noticed in Kherson, as we see in different places. We’ll by no means acknowledge it. The entire world won’t ever acknowledge it. And we are going to do the whole lot potential on the battlefield, but in addition diplomatically, to revive our territorial integrity and sovereignty.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So the world won’t ever acknowledge it?
AMBASSADOR OKSANA MARKAROVA: I am constructive.
MARGARET BRENNAN: That means?
AMBASSADOR OKSANA MARKAROVA: I am constructive.
Ukraine needs to be complete throughout the internationally acknowledged borders.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So, these sanctions the West has placed on would keep in place…
AMBASSADOR OKSANA MARKAROVA: Completely.
MARGARET BRENNAN: … is one other method to say that.
, we’re seeing these experiences out of Mariupol that there have been some profitable evacuations. It is only a dire humanitarian scenario there. Are you able to inform us what is occurring on the bottom, who’s left there?
AMBASSADOR OKSANA MARKAROVA: Our courageous defenders, plenty of wounded, a number of medical doctors are nonetheless there.
So, as of yesterday, we noticed the experiences. And our president has completed the whole lot potential to evacuate civilians. Now, whereas that may be a success, in fact, to get the civilians, ladies and kids out, now we have to do not forget that 95 % of Mariupol is destroyed, that tens of thousand civilians died in Mariupol, had been killed by Russians.
Really, extra Mariupol residents had been killed by Russians in two months than by Nazis throughout two years of Nazi occupation in — throughout the World Struggle II. So, we’re calling on everybody to do the whole lot potential and not possible to get our wounded troopers, to get our heroes, to create all potential corridors in an effort to get our individuals nonetheless out from Azovstal, the place they bravely defend the Ukrainian flag and Ukraine in Mariupol.
MARGARET BRENNAN: That is that metal plant the place…
AMBASSADOR OKSANA MARKAROVA: Sure.
MARGARET BRENNAN: … fighters have been holed up with some civilians.
President Zelenskyy stated influential states had been concerned in efforts to rescue a whole lot of wounded fighters there. Who precisely helps? What does that imply? Is that on-the-ground assist? Is it simply diplomatic?
AMBASSADOR OKSANA MARKAROVA: Properly, we all know that U.N. secretary-general has been in direct contact with our president, but in addition with others.
There are a number of diplomatic discussions with different states on that. So I feel, after the conflict, we can speak about all of the efforts that had been — that had been completed…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Israel, for instance.
AMBASSADOR OKSANA MARKAROVA: However, on the bottom, it is — it is our courageous Ukrainians.
And whereas evacuating civilians, now we have to know that so lots of our troopers from Azov metal, from this plant who had been attempting — serving to civilians to get out have been killed and wounded throughout these makes an attempt too.
MARGARET BRENNAN: How vital is the intelligence sharing that the West is offering to Ukraine? We hear quite a bit concerning the weapons, however what concerning the precise sharing of knowledge?
AMBASSADOR OKSANA MARKAROVA: I feel the sharing of knowledge between Ukraine and the West with all of our mates and allies is on the degree which we by no means had earlier than. And we actually respect it.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Ambassador, thanks on your time at present.
AMBASSADOR OKSANA MARKAROVA: Thanks.
MARGARET BRENNAN: We’ll be proper again with much more Face the Nation.
So, stick with us.
(ANNOUNCEMENTS)
MARGARET BRENNAN: We need to flip again to the combat over abortion rights with Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace of South Carolina. She’s in Charleston this morning.
Pleased Mom’s Day to you, Congresswoman.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY MACE (R-South Carolina): Thanks. And pleased Mom’s Day to all of the mothers on the market at present.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I need to have a dialog with you right here after which we’ll proceed it on the opposite aspect of this break.
However, first up, you might be towards abortion, however you imagine that victims of rape and victims of incest ought to nonetheless have entry to abortion. Do you assume these exceptions ought to be backed up with a federal legislation?
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY MACE: Properly, completely.
I am somebody who — I’m pro-life, however I do assist exceptions for rape. I am a rape sufferer myself. And while you understand what’s occurred in your life, the trauma, the emotional, the psychological, the bodily trauma in a lady’s life, that call — she ought to make that call along with her physician and between her and her God.
And I’ve labored to assist these exceptions in my life, not solely as a state lawmaker, however now as a member of Congress. And South Carolina has a fetal heartbeat invoice that was signed into legislation that had these exceptions as a result of I instructed my rape story.
And people tales are sometimes missed and criticized, and ladies are attacked once they inform these tales. And that is one thing that I’ve talked about extensively all through the years as nicely.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I do know you could have. And I need to speak to you about these as nicely, as a result of there’s a lot nuance right here.
I will take a fast industrial break.
And I need to ask you in additional element what sort of laws you assume might cross on the federal degree, what must occur on the state degree.
So, stick with us, in case you would.
We can be proper again in a second.
(ANNOUNCEMENTS)
MARGARET BRENNAN: We can be proper again with Congresswoman Nancy Mace.
So, stick with us.
(ANNOUNCEMENTS)
MARGARET BRENNAN: Welcome again to FACE THE NATION.
We need to proceed our dialog with South Carolina Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace.
Congresswoman, you could have spoken publicly about being molested while you had been 14, raped at age 16, and the way that has formed your emotions and convictions about rape.
I learn that you just stated that it took you 25 years to speak about your assault and that you just solely shared it together with your mom and certainly one of your good mates. So, I’m wondering what you consider a few of these restrictions in states that may require rape victims to supply police experiences in an effort to receive an abortion.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY MACE:: Proper. Properly, I can not converse to different states. I – – from expertise as a state lawmaker, I do know that South Carolina’s fetal heartbeat invoice wouldn’t have handed with out exceptions for rape, incest, and lifetime of the mom. And I instructed that story. I felt it was actually — a very vital story. A narrative that is typically missed and never instructed as a result of ladies are afraid.
And you’ll even see in public feedback and on social media after I speak about it, the methods wherein that I get attacked for telling that story. And one of many issues that I feel, you recognize, partially that is lacking on this dialog is that, when you could have victims. When Ohio did their fetal heartbeat invoice, there was a 10-year-old lady that had been discovered to be pregnant, who was raped repeatedly by her father. And so, as — I now it is a part of the Republican Social gathering platform, the overwhelming majority of Republicans assist these exceptions for rape, and incest, and lifetime of the mom. And it is vital for — for a few of us to step ahead and inform these tales which can be typically missed in all of this as nicely.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
So, to be clear, you’d assist a vote in Congress, federal laws, to enshrine these exceptions?
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY MACE: Properly, sure, and I feel that — I feel one of many issues that is lacking, and I am glad that you just’re bringing this up, in the entire dialog, the media protection about Roe vs. Wade being overturned, is that what this does — it is not an all-out federal ban on abortion, nevertheless it places it again into state legislators and into Congress.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Proper.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY MACE: You noticed Congress a few years in the past ban late- time period abortions, for instance. And so what this does is it places it again to the states, it places it again into Congress to cope with and determine.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Precisely.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY MACE: And it was even Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who everyone knows was a — was working for ladies’s proper and thought there was a constitutional proper for ladies to have an abortion.
MARGARET BRENNAN: She did.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY MACE: Knew that Roe v. Wade was flawed.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure, she did. She stated that. She stated that again within the ’90s. It was an issue in her affirmation course of.
However — so let’s speak about states then.
The governor of South Carolina, your own home state, fellow Republican, stated if Roe v. Wade is overturned, he desires additional restrictions with out these exceptions of rape or incest. He is contemplating limiting abortions after six weeks of being pregnant. Is that too restrictive?
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY MACE: Properly, I might solely assist laws in South Carolina that had exceptions for rape and incest and lifetime of the mom. I do not imagine that that may cross with out these exceptions.
MARGARET BRENNAN: However what about six weeks of being pregnant?
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY MACE: Properly, that — that invoice has already been signed into legislation, the fetal heartbeat invoice for South Carolina that he signed, I assume it was final 12 months, had a — it was — it was six to eight weeks is when the heartbeat is discovered, however that invoice had exceptions for rape and incest and lifetime of the mom. In order that legislation is already on the books in South Carolina. And it will likely be as much as the legislature to find out if they need much more restrictions on it.
MARGARET BRENNAN: However — however that is the place this will get messy, proper, is in case you’re saying it is as much as the states. Once we take a look at nationwide polling, it reveals that there’s a majority of People who need to form of preserve the established order.
On the state degree, do you truly assume the South Carolina legislature is in tune with public opinion right here as a result of, I imply, our polling reveals greater than two-thirds of Republicans say abortion ought to be usually out there or out there with stricter limits. Is it a political mistake to simply paint this as pro-life, pro-choice?
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY MACE: Properly, I feel that among the polling is murky, too. It is dependent upon the way you ask the query and who’s paying for the polling. There’s some polling on the market that claims that there are solely 25 % of People, some say as much as 30 %, that need abortion in ever case. They do not need any restrictions. So that claims to me that there is a huge — a overwhelming majority of People which can be OK with restrictions on abortion. And now we have among the most liberal abortion legal guidelines on this planet. In the event you take a look at Europe, there are various European nations that do not enable abortion after the primary trimester or after 15 weeks.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Twelve weeks or so.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY MACE: Sure.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY MACE: And in Poland, for instance, they do not enable any abortions except there it is rape, incest or lifetime of the mom. And so it’s a sophisticated challenge.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Proper. It’s kind of of an outlier there in Europe. It’s.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY MACE: Proper. However, you recognize, Portugal is 12 weeks. Sure.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Proper.
Congresswoman, I need to rapidly ask you, you are being primaried by a Trump-backed candidate. Do you assume your place on that is going to make it extra sophisticated for you? Do you assume President Trump remains to be the chief of your celebration?
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY MACE: Properly, my place on life with exceptions for rape, incest and the lifetime of the mom is according to my district, it is according to the vast majority of, I imagine, voters in my state as nicely. We have raised over $4.5 million for this race. My opponent has raised lower than $300,000. And, you recognize, I am working very arduous to win this, not simply by single digits, however by double digits. And I feel he is been given dangerous recommendation.
My opponent misplaced — had her high secret safety clearance revoked for leaking labeled details about our army.
MARGARET BRENNAN: OK.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY MACE: I reside in a really fiscally conservative district, and she or he voted for the very best tax hike in South Carolina historical past.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY MACE: And so there are very stark contrasts in our document.
MARGARET BRENNAN: OK.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY MACE: And we have raised probably the most cash. We’ve the very best polling. And I’ve bought 40 days to go till the June major and I am wanting ahead to successful.
MARGARET BRENNAN: We’ll look ahead to it.
Thanks, Congresswoman.
We’ll be proper again.
(ANNOUNCEMENTS)
MARGARET BRENNAN: We now flip to Jim Taiclet, the CEO of protection large Lockheed Martin, which makes among the weapons the U.S. is sending to Ukraine in its combat towards Russia.
Good morning to you, sir.
JIM TAICLET, CEO, LOCKHEED MARTIN: Good morning, Margaret. Pleased Mom’s Day to you.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Thanks very a lot for saying that.
We hear repeatedly probably the most highly effective instruments that the Ukrainians have are these anti-tank, Russian tank busting missiles often called javelins. That is what your organization collectively produces with Raytheon.
How rapidly are you able to scale up manufacturing to get extra to them and to backfill what the U.S. has given up?
JIM TAICLET: Certain, Margaret.
Properly, the president visited us in Troy, Alabama, to thank the workforce earlier this week and we actually respect what he is completed for us.
We’re, due to this fact, on our aspect, accelerating our funding in that manufacturing unit and in our workforce there. So we’re already investing forward of time to purchase tooling, to develop the plant and in addition assist our suppliers to get able to ramp up manufacturing. So, proper now our capability 2,100 javelin missiles per 12 months. We’re endeavoring to take that as much as 4,000 per 12 months. And that can take a lot of months, possibly even a few years to get there as a result of now we have to get our provide chain to additionally crank up as we do.
So, we predict we are able to virtually double the capability in an affordable period of time.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Raytheon had stated {that a} totally different system, the stingers, they could not even get happening ramping that up till 2023. However you can begin when, precisely?
JIM TAICLET: We’re beginning now to ramp it up as a result of now we have an energetic manufacturing line proper now that the president noticed. And, additionally, we have a provide chain that is energetic, along with that. So we are able to begin turning up the warmth now and ramping the manufacturing instantly due to these circumstances.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You stated — nicely, you implied your mainly doing on spec, proper?
JIM TAICLET: That is proper.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You are anticipating that order goes to return by means of from the U.S. authorities.
However you are a businessperson. You need to plan forward. We do not know the way lengthy this conflict goes to final. The CIA says, you recognize, Vladimir Putin thinks he is bought to double down right here. So, how lengthy are you planning for with this ramp up?
JIM TAICLET: We’re planning for the long term, and never simply within the javelin, as a result of this case, the Ukrainian battle, has highlighted a few actually vital issues for us. One is that we have to have superior programs in giant sufficient numbers. So like javelins, stingers, superior cruise missiles, gear like that. So, we all know there’s going to be elevated demand for these sorts of programs from the U.S. —
MARGARET BRENNAN: All through — OK.
JIM TAICLET: And for our allies as nicely and past into Asia Pacific almost definitely too.
The second actually priceless lesson was management of the air house is admittedly important. So, the Ukrainians are managing to regulate their air house. The Russian air drive does not have free reign over the complete nation. And the explanation that they do not is as a result of the Ukrainians can nonetheless fly their plane they usually even have a fairly efficient built-in air and missile protection system. So merchandise and programs like F-16, F-35, patriot missiles, THAAD missiles, we all know that there is going to be elevated demand for these sorts of kit, too, as a result of the menace between Russia and China is simply going to extend even after the Ukrainian conflict, we hope is over quickly. Although two nations, and regionally Iran and North Korea, aren’t going to get much less energetic. Most likely they are going to get extra energetic. So we need to be certain we are able to provide our allies and our nation what they should defend towards that.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So what do it’s essential to do this, since you did say provide chain is a matter? I learn that there is over, what, 250 microchips or semiconductors in every javelin.
JIM TAICLET: That is proper.
MARGARET BRENNAN: We all know there’s an effort in Congress to get laws to attempt to create extra semiconductors right here as a substitute of counting on Asian suppliers. Are you able to do that scale-up with out that form of laws?
JIM TAICLET: It is going to be extraordinarily useful to have the bipartisan innovation act handed, for instance, as a result of we do want to speculate extra within the infrastructure within the U.S. so now we have home provide, particularly in microprocessors. And so our manufacturing line can run at present, however sooner or later we will want extra home functionality in microprocessor, not solely design, however manufacturing, testing, et cetera, in order that had been have assured provide of these microprocessors sooner or later.
And there can be different inputs too, however that is one of many highlighted ones.
MARGARET BRENNAN: However we have heard on this program repeatedly from enterprise individuals how vital that’s to get completed. Congress nonetheless hasn’t voted on it or voted it by means of.
JIM TAICLET: Proper.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Do you could have any commitments from anybody right here in Washington to get this to the president’s desk quickly?
JIM TAICLET: Properly, we all know that there is a number of assist for it each in Congress, within the administration, the Commerce Division, et cetera.
MARGARET BRENNAN: As a result of it takes time to scale that up?
JIM TAICLET: Sure, it does. It takes years. And so we’re collaborating proper now, for instance, with Intel. It is certainly one of our companions in attempting to drive what we name twenty first century safety into nationwide protection. And we will want probably the most superior processors and we will want them to be customizable to protection wants as nicely. So having that home functionality once more to go all over manufacturing and testing goes to be extra vital sooner or later than it’s even at present.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You additionally make F-35s fighter jets, you referenced there. Germany is now attempting to purchase them. I imply you could have a number of patrons in Europe proper now doubtlessly.
Do you could have sufficient staff to fulfill all of those requests?
JIM TAICLET: We’ve sufficient now, however we all know, like, for instance, within the F- 16 line as nicely that we’re build up in South Carolina, truly, we’d like extra staff. And so we’re recruiting closely. We have a really sturdy workforce in Fort Price, Texas, the place we make the F-35s. In order that manufacturing line is working simply superb now. We have ample staff there to do this. However in different elements of the nation, and in the end in Texas, we will want to really rent extra individuals.
MARGARET BRENNAN: All proper, thanks very a lot for giving us perception to your small business.
JIM TAICLET: Glad to do it.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And for being right here in individual.
We’ll be proper again.
(ANNOUNCEMENTS)
MARGARET BRENNAN: Each 10 years the 50 states redraw their political boundaries based mostly on inhabitants adjustments. Some states can achieve seats in Congress, others may lose some. The method is sort of at all times messy as state events attempt to safe an edge for the last decade to return.
CBS’s Ed O’Keefe took a take a look at 4 redistricting fights.
(BEGIN VT)
ED O’KEEFE (voice over): In 4 huge states this 12 months, two purple and two blue, Democrats and Republicans could not agree on a redistricting plan, so courts had been requested to intervene.
New York’s highest courtroom tossed out a map drawn by the Democratic managed state legislature saying lawmakers did an finish run round a non- partisan fee.
New York misplaced one Home seat within the census, and though Republicans at present maintain eight Home seats, the brand new map drawn by Democrats would have make it tough for Republicans to win greater than 4.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: They’re attempting to silence the voices of the individuals on this district.
ED O’KEEFE: The courtroom has appointed an official to attract up yet one more map due this month.
In Illinois, after the state misplaced a Home seat, Democrats eradicated two districts the place Republicans had been anticipated to win. Republicans challenged the brand new map in courtroom, nevertheless it’s more likely to stand.
The GOP can be responsible of artistic cartography. Texas is gaining two seats in Congress. And though minorities accounted for 95 % of the state’s inhabitants progress within the final decade, Republicans redrew the map to guard their incumbents by eliminating aggressive districts had been Democrats had been making positive factors.
The Justice Division and civil rights teams sued.
VANITA GUPTA, ASSOCIATE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL: Texas’ redistricting plans will dilute the elevated minority voting energy that ought to have developed from these vital demographic shifts.
ED O’KEEFE: And in Florida, which additionally gained a Home seat, Republican governor Ron DeSantis insisted state lawmakers draw a map that eradicated an traditionally black congressional district, stretching from Jacksonville to Tallahassee, doubtlessly giving Republicans 4 extra seats.
GOV. RON DESANTIS (R-FL): We’re not going to have a 200 mile gerrymander that divvies up individuals based mostly on the colour of their pores and skin. That’s flawed.
ED O’KEEFE: Democrats have filed go well with, however they’re working out of time earlier than November’s elections.
STATE SEN. TRACIE DAVIS (D-FL): The black inhabitants in Florida that lives north of the I-4 hall, their voices can be diluted.
ED O’KEEFE (on digicam): When the mud settles after this many years spherical of redistricting, it stays to see whether or not both celebration will emerge with a definite structural benefit nationwide. Now, whether or not the brand new strains are pretty drawn, nicely, that is a matter of political desire.
For FACE THE NATION, I am Ed O’Keefe in Washington.
(END VT)
MARGARET BRENNAN: And we flip now to former Obama administration lawyer normal, Eric Holder. He began a bunch in 2016, the Nationwide Democrat Redistricting Committee, to assist the celebration redraw congressional strains. And he has a brand new e book out referred to as, “Our Unfinished March.”
Good morning to you.
ERIC HOLDER, FORMER U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL: Good morning.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Glad to have you ever right here.
, within the e book you write each events have embraced gerrymandering once they had been in command of state governments, however you say Democrats had been caught asleep on the wheel when Republicans began investing 12 years in the past in a few of these native races.
, critics name your technique simply sue to blue. That it is simply all about partisanship. How do you reply to that?
ERIC HOLDER: No, ours is a combat for equity. And, sure, we have introduced a number of lawsuits — efficiently introduced a number of lawsuits in an effort to be sure that the method is completed in a good approach and in order that the American individuals truly choose their representatives versus politicians selecting their voters. And so sue to blue, that is what they are saying while you’re successful in courtroom, which is what now we have completed at an entire bunch of ranges.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You assume Democrats have a bonus then going into the midterms versus the place you began out?
ERIC HOLDER: Properly, I feel we actually stopped the Republicans once they stated they needed to safe a decade of energy on this subsequent decade based mostly on the redistricting that they had been going to do. We’ve blunted that effort and we actually have extra honest maps than we did popping out of the final redistricting cycle.
The factor that actually worries me, nonetheless, is that now we have 40 % fewer aggressive seats than I feel we should always have on account of what each events have completed.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You say that is about equity, however you have not challenged any Democratic gerrymanders. Ed O’Keefe laid out a few of these examples there. Each of the maps handed by Democrats had been thrown out by courts in Maryland and in New York. Do you could have an issue with what occurred there?
ERIC HOLDER: I indicated my opposition to what had occurred, what the legislature did in Maryland. I agreed with the choose, which he did there. And In New York what I’ve stated is that these aren’t the maps that I might have drawn in New York. My guess is that after the courts take a look at what occurred in New York, you will note maps which can be totally different however not essentially totally different.
I feel you possibly can’t examine, nonetheless, what occurred in New York and Maryland to what’s going on in Texas, Georgia, doubtlessly Florida, Wisconsin, the place Republicans have actually gone to city by way of gerrymanders. Basically totally different from what Democrats have completed.
MARGARET BRENNAN: How so?
ERIC HOLDER: They’re — in case you take a look at Texas, which is getting two extra seats strictly on account of the rise within the Hispanic inhabitants, they haven’t elevated that — the ability of Hispanics in Texas in any respect. In truth, they’ve created extra majority white districts in Texas. The map that you just see in New York displays actually a inhabitants shift, a hollowing out of the agricultural areas in New York, in addition to a rise within the city areas in New York.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Proper.
ERIC HOLDER: So there is a census foundation — census bureau foundation of what is occurring in New York that doesn’t exist within the — in Republican states.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You heard there what is occurring in Florida and what Governor Ron DeSantis describes. He says that what he’s doing with redrawing is race impartial. I do know you strongly disagree. Are you saying the gerrymandering there’s rooted in racism?
ERIC HOLDER: It is actually race aware. What he’s doing there, by taking out a historically black seat is actually an element. Race is an element there.
MARGARET BRENNAN: However you assume it is to deliberately disenfranchise?
ERIC HOLDER: That is actually a element of, I feel, their pondering. They are going after Democrats. And the truth that that — the Democrats that they are going after occur to be black I do not assume is essentially a coincidence. The go well with that we received in Alabama was — the place we stated that it is best to have extra illustration for a black — the black inhabitants of Alabama, these districts had been actually drawn with the thought that they’d disenfranchise African-People in Alabama.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I need to ask you about Alabama as a result of as I perceive it, the Supreme Courtroom has tried to not immediately become involved in what they deemed political gerrymandering, however they’ve signaled a willingness to listen to instances that contain problems with race. There are nonetheless elections scheduled in November, within the state of Alabama, though the courtroom will hear this case. Do you assume that the maps being redrawn in Alabama will in the end be deemed to be unlawful and due to this fact the election ought to be invalid? Is that what you are saying?
ERIC HOLDER: Properly, you recognize, it is attention-grabbing — no, it is an attention-grabbing factor. Properly, they are going to have an election in November based mostly on maps that judges, together with two Trump judges, stated had been inappropriately, unconstitutionally drawn. The Supreme Courtroom stated too near the election and so we will enable the election to go forward on these maps that had been discovered to be faulty.
Now, that the Supreme Courtroom will in the end do with Part 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which was the idea for the lawsuit in Alabama, will stay to be seen.
However that is one of many issues I speak about in my e book, this notion of us attending to some structural adjustments, that we have to look — we have to ban partisan gerrymandering. We’d like the buildings of our democracy if we will attempt to — if we will attempt to put it aside.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Properly, you could have a number of totally different suggestions within the e book, however, I imply, it is a lengthy to-do listing. And the issue that you just sketch out right here, you say that the complete democratic system, primarily, is damaged, as I perceive it. Unrepresentative Senate, pointless anti- democrat Electoral Faculty, gerrymandered Home of Representatives, panoply of state legislatures, and a stolen Supreme Courtroom. A stolen Supreme Courtroom. You say each individual having an equal say in our democracy, one individual, one vote, is much from a actuality.
ERIC HOLDER: Sure, I feel that is true.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You are saying the complete system is damaged. What — so if Republicans win management of Congress in November, is that election — does it not have integrity? Do you not settle for the end result of it?
ERIC HOLDER: No, I feel your premise goes somewhat far. I would not say that the whole lot is damaged, however there’s —
MARGARET BRENNAN: I used to be studying out of your e book there.
ERIC HOLDER: No, what I am saying — I might say is, there’s a substantial quantity of our construction that must be repaired, that must be examined. And I feel we should always — what I’ve tried to place out — level out within the e book is that now we have confronted these points earlier than and that we have had heroes and heroines in our historical past which have confronted comparable sorts of points and thru sacrifice, dedication, they’ve made a distinction. And now we have the capability, I feel, to make these sorts of adjustments. Banning partisan gerrymanders.
In the event you take a look at the Supreme Courtroom, now we have two seats, one stolen from the Democrats that Merrick Garland ought to have now. That — that seat was not stuffed as a result of it was to shut to an election. After which Amy Coney Barrett was positioned right into a seat whereas individuals had been truly voting. I imply these are the sorts of issues that I feel must be addressed. And what I speak about within the e book is to say, look, we should always time period restrict the justices, 18 years, and that each president ought to have a possibility to appoint two justices per time period and to attempt to take among the strain out of this — the partisanship and the affirmation course of.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Republicans would, clearly, disagree together with your characterization of how that performed out.
However I do need — Merrick Garland, you talked about, he is now in your previous job as lawyer normal.
ERIC HOLDER: Uh-huh.
MARGARET BRENNAN: There have been critics of him who say that he is not being aggressive sufficient across the prosecutions relating to January the sixth. Do you assume that is proper?
ERIC HOLDER: Nobody is aware of. I imply, you recognize, I’ve nice religion in Merrick and within the individuals on the Justice Division. We cannot actually know the way aggressive they’ve been till they’re earlier than a digicam and saying a call, both to indict sure individuals or not indict sure individuals. And this is my prediction, sooner or later individuals on the Justice Division, maybe that prosecutor in Atlanta, are going to should make a dedication about whether or not or not they need to indict Donald Trump. The air goes to be —
MARGARET BRENNAN: Would you do it?
ERIC HOLDER: Properly, I feel there’s going to be ample factual info. And I feel that there is going to be ample proof of intent.
After which the query turns into, what is the affect of such an indictment. I am an institutionalist. My preliminary thought was to not indict the previous president out of concern of what — how divisive it could be. However given what now we have realized, I feel that he most likely needs to be held accountable.
MARGARET BRENNAN: We’ll depart it on that unimaginable word.
Mr. Holder, thanks on your time and for sharing your e book.
We’ll be proper again.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
MARGARET BRENNAN: That is it for us at present. Thanks all for watching. And to the entire moms watching, Pleased Mom’s Day to you. Till subsequent week, for FACE THE NATION, I am Margaret Brennan.
[ad_2]
Source link