[ad_1]
From steering issued Friday:
- It stays illegal to hold a firearm in Massachusetts and not using a license….
- Licensing authorities ought to proceed to implement the “prohibited individual” and
“suitability” provisions of the license-to-carry statute….- Licensing authorities ought to stop enforcement of the “good motive” provision of the license-to-carry statute in response to Bruen. Authorities ought to not deny, or impose restrictions on, a license to hold as a result of the applicant lacks a sufficiently good motive to hold a firearm. An applicant who’s neither a “prohibited individual” or “unsuitable” have to be issued an unrestricted license to hold.
- Licensing authorities could proceed to inquire in regards to the the reason why the applicant desires a license, however could solely use that info to evaluate the prohibited individual and suitability necessities of the statute. They might not use that info to disclaim or prohibit a license for lack of a sufficiently good motive to hold a firearm.
- The FID [Firearms Identification] Card Course of Is Unaffected by Bruen. As a result of there isn’t a “good motive” provision for issuance of an FID card, licensing authorities ought to proceed to course of and challenge FID playing cards precisely as they did previous to Bruen….
The [Massachusetts concealed carry] statute instructs {that a} “willpower of unsuitability shall be based mostly on: (i) dependable and credible info that the applicant or licensee has exhibited or engaged in habits that means that, if issued a license, the applicant or licensee could create a danger to public security; or (ii) current elements that recommend that, if issued a license, the applicant or licensee could create a danger to public security.” …
Due to Dr. Ed for the pointer.
[ad_2]
Source link